For more than a decade Kiah Consultants have been assisting with commercial negotiations, restructure of poorly performing projects and dispute resolution. Our clients regularly ask us to share those experiences with their staff, seeking insight into how their organisations might better address their challenges.
Kiah Insight Blog
Registering for the Kiah Blog will give you access to the regular observations and developments in negotiation and dispute resolution as well as updates of developing Kiah programs.
You can also follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter,
Download one of our Case studies or White Papers.....
A Government client seeking to establish an unorthodox public– private sector collaboration...
Breaking a three-year dispute over service delivery and costs that had put a $1 billion-plus contract on the brink of failure...
The contract was worth more than $100 million per annum, had been in place for three years, and had a six-month renewable term. Client staff were dissatisfied and viewed the contract as over-priced...
It is conventional wisdom that competitive tendering will deliver the best value outcome, particularly in government procurement, and is often the only mechanism employed in pursuit of that value. Often this results from an overly constrained interpretation of government procurement guidelines that interprets tendering as the only viable process to achieve competitive outcomes.
The last decade saw the rise of major outsourcing efforts with varying degrees of success. The outsourcing arena is changing. Smaller, more selective arrangements, tailored to an organisation’s specific needs, are the norm. This paper looks at seven considerations to achieve a successful sourcing arrangement.
Throughout our work we engage a variety of management consulting and legal services, either directly or through our client. Regularly we are handed the results of previous engagements, too often accompanied with statements like: ‘this is OK but not as useful as we had hoped’, or ‘doesn’t quite answer the question’.
Much of the western world’s thinking, strategy development, management and problem solving is based on exhaustive analysis — the search for evidence to formulate the way forward. The flaw? The future cannot be designed by analysis of the past: the analysis serves to constrain, rather than facilitate, innovation. Design for the future calls for the integration of innovation, judgement and decision-making. This integration of social and analytical — we term Integrative Development (InD©).
Programs, large or small, public sector or commercial, will almost certainly be faced with a level of disagreement at some stage. It is a natural part of doing business, but it is when disagreement and misalignment is not resolved in a timely manner that the issues become problematic. At Kiah, we deal with deadlock, disputes, rapid establishment, re-alignment and recovery: public, private and across the divide as neutral facilitators and mediators or as advocates.
Connect with us
This is a program about people. Just a few who will undoubtedly inspire, create and make a difference to those around them.
Read more here.
Stay tuned - follow the blog or #KiahConsulting on social media.